Sinful-Graduate
0xef31adc9c1813a920728c01a85d4859e8bf41798
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
27
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.8K
Realised
$35.38
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 27- SUNS
1H Spread: Heat (-0.5)
834 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-433.48
- KNICKS
Spread: Knicks (-3.5)
300 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 19, 2025$0.00
$-161.99
- DRX
LoL: DRX vs DN Freecs (BO3) - LCK Cup Group Stage
265 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-138.00
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-01-21?
241 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-111.00
- OVER
Clippers vs. Thunder: O/U 223.5
200 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 19, 2025$0.00
$-98.00
- NETS
Spread: Heat (-7.5)
185 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 19, 2025$0.00
$-99.90
- TIMBERWOLVES
Spread: Timberwolves (-8.5)
170 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 18, 2025$0.00
$-78.20
- YES
Will Sevilla FC vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?
168 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-63.87
- UP
XRP Up or Down - December 17, 7:30AM-7:45AM ET
160 shares @ 33.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 17, 2025$0.00
$-54.20
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 17, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET
150 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 17, 2025$0.00
$-78.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$0.31Jan 25, 00:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla FC vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?$38.79Jan 24, 18:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla FC vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?$6.08Jan 24, 18:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla FC vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?$17.10Jan 24, 18:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla FC vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?$1.90Jan 24, 18:08 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - January 24, 12PM ET$39.61Jan 24, 17:56 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - January 24, 12PM ET$24.25Jan 24, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 24, 12PM ET$63.21Jan 24, 17:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 12:00PM-12:15PM ET$0.06Jan 24, 17:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 12:00PM-12:15PM ET$1.02Jan 24, 17:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 12:00PM-12:15PM ET$12.42Jan 24, 17:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 12:00PM-12:15PM ET$8.10Jan 24, 17:07 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - January 24, 11:30AM-11:45AM ET$17.50Jan 24, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 24, 11:30AM-11:45AM ET$20.00Jan 24, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 24, 11:15AM-11:30AM ET$21.60Jan 24, 16:25 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - January 24, 11:00AM-11:15AM ET$39.95Jan 24, 16:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 11:00AM-11:15AM ET$18.87Jan 24, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 11:00AM-11:15AM ET$1.53Jan 24, 15:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET$6.52Jan 24, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - January 24, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET$2.71Jan 24, 15:45 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $35.09
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 23, 08:53 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 25, 00:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".