Tired-Hundred
0xf026af2d5ff43862cbd9795c02acc7abd3afca17
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
72
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 72- YES
Khamenei seen in public by March 1?
200 shares @ 5.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-11.90
- YES
Will Atalanta BC win on 2026-03-07?
151 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-86.01
- YES
Will Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-03-07?
111 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-53.24
- YES
Will Adelaide United FC win on 2026-03-06?
75 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 6, 2026$0.00
$-41.88
- YES
Will Casa Pia AC win on 2026-03-01?
75 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- LIQUID
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs Passion UA (BO3) - ESL Pro League Stage 1
58 shares @ 51.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?
57 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- EX-RUBY
Counter-Strike: ex-RUBY vs FORZE Reload (BO3) - European Pro League Series 5 Group A
56 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- YES
Will Levante UD vs. Deportivo Alavés end in a draw?
54 shares @ 36.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will FC Metz win on 2026-03-01?
51 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Atalanta BC win on 2026-03-07?$86.01Mar 7, 15:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWill ES Troyes AC win on 2026-03-07?$86.01Mar 7, 15:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-03-07?$53.24Mar 7, 07:49 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Newcastle United Jets FC vs. Western Sydney Wanderers FC end in a draw?$9.47Mar 7, 07:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill ES Troyes AC win on 2026-03-07?$50.00Mar 7, 07:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United Jets FC vs. Western Sydney Wanderers FC end in a draw?$20.00Mar 7, 07:20 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami (OH) RedHawks vs. Ohio Bobcats$100.96Mar 7, 06:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYMiami (OH) RedHawks vs. Ohio Bobcats$70.00Mar 6, 22:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Nuggets$20.00Mar 6, 22:27 UTC
- TRADESELLWill CA Grau win on 2026-03-06?$102.80Mar 6, 22:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill COD Meknès vs. IR Tanger end in a draw?$9.95Mar 6, 22:13 UTC
- TRADESELLWill CA Osasuna win on 2026-03-06?$9.95Mar 6, 22:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Grau win on 2026-03-06?$80.42Mar 6, 21:30 UTC
- TRADESELLWill SSC Napoli win on 2026-03-06?$80.42Mar 6, 21:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Osasuna win on 2026-03-06?$10.14Mar 6, 20:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club win on 2026-03-05?$10.14Mar 6, 20:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SSC Napoli win on 2026-03-06?$51.99Mar 6, 19:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Australia win?$51.99Mar 6, 19:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Acend vs Omega (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #17 Group Stage$26.65Mar 6, 13:25 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-03-07?$16.83Mar 6, 13:24 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $31.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 5, 06:40 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 7, 15:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".