Functional-Theft
0xf09bb2872f806e9be8d317d58bf2bd20823a5971
Wallet digest
Activity score
40/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
157
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.1K
Realised
$-54.32
Win rate
25%
24 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 157- YES
Will Gwangju FC win on 2026-03-14?
86 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- YES
Will Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-03-12?
80 shares @ 16.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 12, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- NEWCASTLE UNITED JETS FC
Spread: Newcastle United Jets FC (-1.5)
73 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-11.69
- OVER
Central Coast Mariners FC vs. Adelaide United FC: O/U 2.5
66 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-20.47
- YES
Will SV Darmstadt 98 win on 2026-03-13?
62 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 13, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- LIVERPOOL FC
Spread: Liverpool FC (-1.5)
56 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will FK Orenburg win on 2026-03-13?
56 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 13, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will CA Vélez Sarsfield win on 2026-03-10?
56 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Clube do Remo vs. Fluminense FC: Both Teams to Score
54 shares @ 22.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 12, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- OVER
Denmark vs. North Macedonia: O/U 4.5
53 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 26, 2026$0.00
$-19.20
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSSC Napoli vs. AC Milan: O/U 2.5$15.16Apr 6, 18:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Sporting de Gijón vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 2.5$15.00Apr 6, 18:49 UTC
- TRADESELLSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$2.44Apr 6, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$5.00Apr 6, 18:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Swansea City AFC win on 2026-04-06?$5.00Apr 6, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$3.67Apr 6, 18:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Sochi vs. FK Rubin Kazan end in a draw?$2.00Apr 6, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Sochi vs. FK Rubin Kazan end in a draw?$2.00Apr 6, 17:56 UTC
- TRADESELLSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$7.65Apr 6, 17:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$10.00Apr 6, 17:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. Genoa CFC: Both Teams to Score$5.00Apr 6, 17:40 UTC
- TRADESELLJuventus FC vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 4.5$0.18Apr 6, 17:36 UTC
- TRADESELLSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$24.84Apr 6, 17:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$10.00Apr 6, 17:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$5.23Apr 6, 17:03 UTC
- TRADESELLSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$15.23Apr 6, 17:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYSwansea City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$14.00Apr 6, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. Genoa CFC: Both Teams to Score$1.68Apr 6, 16:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 4.5$6.00Apr 6, 16:36 UTC
- TRADESELLJuventus FC vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 4.5$6.46Apr 6, 16:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $8.61
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 6, 13:20 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 6, 18:51 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 24 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".