Shallow-Geometry
0xf09e89a58f79e40d0bda6a10254bb6591cfdb011
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-800.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 4AM ET$100.00Oct 12, 19:05 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 5AM ET$105.00Oct 12, 19:05 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 6AM ET$210.00Oct 12, 19:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 6AM ET$105.00Oct 10, 23:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 5AM ET$52.50Oct 10, 23:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 4AM ET$50.00Oct 10, 23:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 3AM ET$100.00Oct 10, 23:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 11, 2AM ET$700.00Oct 10, 23:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $201.50
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 10, 23:17 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 12, 19:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".