Wobbly-Documentation
0xf1ed5d76dbe59620ad573d8f0554e64e8409de73
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
47
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.7K
Realised
$-1.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 47- WARRIORS
Warriors vs. Thunder
1000 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 12, 2025$0.00
$-270.00
- OCONNELL
Rotterdam Open: Ugo Humbert vs Christopher O'Connell
540 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-102.60
- NO
Will Galatasaray SK win on 2026-02-13?
500 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-65.00
- ITALY
Men's Group B - Italy vs. Slovakia
470 shares @ 6.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-32.37
- KECMANOVIC
Dallas Open: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Ben Shelton
460 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-82.80
- DARTMOUTH BIG GREEN
Yale Bulldogs vs. Dartmouth Big Green
450 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-80.99
- ZANDSCHULP
Rotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp
433 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-65.00
- JOVIC
Australian Open Women's: Aryna Sabalenka vs Iva Jovic
400 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-60.00
- SHELTON
Australian Open Men's: Ben Shelton vs Jannik Sinner
356 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-32.06
- YES
Will Brentford FC win on 2026-02-12?
303 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-45.45
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Cavaliers$3.79May 26, 01:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Cavaliers$0.80May 26, 01:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Cavaliers$0.72May 26, 01:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Cavaliers$2.16May 26, 01:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.72May 26, 01:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$1.00May 26, 01:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.74May 26, 00:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.15May 26, 00:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.20May 26, 00:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$1.54May 26, 00:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.20May 26, 00:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.20May 26, 00:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Phillies vs. San Diego Padres$0.21May 26, 00:48 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros WTA: Hanyu Guo vs McCartney Kessler$22.93May 26, 00:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Hanyu Guo vs McCartney Kessler$16.74May 25, 20:30 UTC
- REDEEMAC Milan vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 7.5 Total Corners$4.99May 25, 16:42 UTC
- REDEEMAC Milan vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 9.5 Total Corners$11.86May 25, 16:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Milan vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 9.5 Total Corners$2.29May 24, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Milan vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 9.5 Total Corners$2.76May 24, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Milan vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 7.5 Total Corners$0.19May 24, 20:26 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $4.91
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 23, 01:46 UTC
- Last active
- May 26, 01:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".