Experienced-Sloth
0xf384acc4fedeb0cc4e1b28126988b7995dde9014
Wallet digest
Activity score
42/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-339.32
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- MAGIC
Magic vs. Timberwolves
375 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2025$0.00
$-75.00
- FLYERS
Flyers vs. Lightning
331 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2025$0.00
$-99.34
- NETS
Nets vs. Bulls
311 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2025$0.00
$-139.99
- YES
Will Ipswich win on 2025-03-15?
104 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2025$0.00
$-24.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYFlyers vs. Lightning$99.34Mar 17, 10:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ipswich win on 2025-03-15?$24.99Mar 14, 15:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Timberwolves$75.00Mar 14, 15:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYNets vs. Bulls$139.99Mar 13, 10:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $84.83
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 13, 10:25 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 17, 10:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".