Demanding-Handicap
0xf3b7a7fe43db56588f746f355da9cc25d48bdbda
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
37
Open notional
$22.50
Total PnL
$-33.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 37- KINGS
Lakers vs. Kings
23 shares @ 40.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 13, 2026$22.50
$13.50
- UNDER
Al Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5
5664 shares @ 45.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-2.6K
- HIJIKATA
Brisbane International: Rinky Hijikata vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
4354 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- UNDER
Juventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 3.5
4059 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-2.7K
- UNDER
Juventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 4.5
3451 shares @ 57.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- UNDER
Bruins vs. Kraken: O/U 6.5
2548 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- NO
Will Al Taawoun Saudi Club win on 2026-01-09?
2527 shares @ 59.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
CD Leganés vs. Real Valladolid CF: O/U 2.5
2481 shares @ 54.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- UNDER
Perth Glory FC vs. Central Coast Mariners FC: O/U 2.5
2083 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 10, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- UNDER
Al Khaleej Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 2.5
2066 shares @ 50.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLakers vs. Kings$9.00Jan 13, 03:46 UTC
- REDEEMSD Huesca vs. Córdoba CF: O/U 3.5$9.00Jan 13, 03:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 4.5$995.05Jan 12, 20:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 4.5$1000.00Jan 12, 20:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYSD Huesca vs. Córdoba CF: O/U 3.5$4.95Jan 12, 20:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 3.5$1000.00Jan 12, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYJuventus FC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 3.5$1.7KJan 12, 19:32 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$429.39Jan 12, 19:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$100.00Jan 12, 19:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$50.00Jan 12, 18:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$2.6KJan 12, 17:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$500.00Jan 12, 15:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$500.00Jan 12, 15:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$300.00Jan 12, 14:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$100.00Jan 12, 14:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$100.00Jan 12, 12:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$155.00Jan 12, 12:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$45.99Jan 12, 12:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$300.00Jan 12, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYBucks vs. Nuggets$501.00Jan 12, 02:27 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $589.53
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 11, 13:37 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 13, 03:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".