Calculating-Hazelnut
0xf693920a12b1fadc624ddd632026ede16cd6b810
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
72
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-265.64
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 72- YES
Will Eintracht Frankfurt win on 2026-02-21?
1000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Portland Timbers vs. Columbus Crew end in a draw?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- JAZZ
Jazz vs. Rockets
515 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- NETS
Spurs vs. Nets
500 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 18, 9:45AM-9:50AM ET
200 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- KANSAS JAYHAWKS
Kansas Jayhawks vs. Arizona Wildcats
128 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-03-01?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down on February 17?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- KANSAS JAYHAWKS
Spread: Arizona Wildcats (-10.5)
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Angers SCO win on 2026-02-22?
92 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?$14.44Mar 1, 15:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$1.00Mar 1, 15:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-01?$1.00Mar 1, 15:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?$1.00Mar 1, 15:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tottenham Hotspur FC win on 2026-03-01?$1.00Mar 1, 15:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-03-01?$1.00Mar 1, 15:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC vs. Crystal Palace FC end in a draw?$1.00Mar 1, 15:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Arizona Wildcats (-10.5)$1.00Feb 28, 23:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYKansas Jayhawks vs. Arizona Wildcats$1.00Feb 28, 22:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill AFC Bournemouth vs. Sunderland AFC end in a draw?$3.23Feb 28, 22:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Heidenheim 1846 win on 2026-02-28?$10.00Feb 28, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 28, 9:25AM-9:30AM ET$1.00Feb 28, 14:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Holstein Kiel win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Kaiserslautern win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AFC Bournemouth vs. Sunderland AFC end in a draw?$1.00Feb 28, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. Brentford FC end in a draw?$1.00Feb 28, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill West Ham United FC win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club win on 2026-02-28?$1.00Feb 28, 13:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $1.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 22, 15:44 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 1, 15:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".