Unsightly-Fourths
0xf93a89073c3457f442ef5c0c50cf5d406ded6902
Wallet digest
Activity score
76/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$11.15
Total PnL
$0.01
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid dip to $32 in May?$11.14May 30, 12:38 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $1,000 in April?$12.79May 18, 18:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,000 in April?$12.78Apr 26, 11:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill S&P 500 (SPX) hit $5,000 (LOW) in March 2026?$11.66Apr 20, 19:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill S&P 500 (SPX) hit $5,000 (LOW) in March 2026?$11.65Mar 26, 11:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta dip to $470 in January?$12.99Feb 10, 20:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta dip to $470 in January?$12.98Jan 29, 08:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google (GOOGL) close above $250 end of November?$14.22Dec 11, 05:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Google (GOOGL) close above $250 end of November?$14.21Nov 27, 18:36 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $2600 in October?$13.28Nov 5, 11:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2600 in October?$12.97Oct 19, 12:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $6500 in August?$1.49Sep 18, 00:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $6500 in August?$1.49Aug 26, 08:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin close above $100K on July 31?$1.03Aug 7, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin close above $100K on July 31?$1.02Jul 27, 22:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $1.4 in June?$1.63Jul 7, 09:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $1.4 in June?$1.63Jun 29, 02:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill Hyperliquid dip to $9 before June?$1.00Jun 2, 02:43 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $1.50 in May?$1.36Jun 2, 02:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid dip to $9 before June?$1.00May 25, 18:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 30
- Avg trade size
- $221.38
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 7, 05:22 UTC
- Last active
- May 30, 12:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.