Outrageous-Crewman
0xfa08eb9b608bffa11375b627456b00193182b12d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
41
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-150.10
Realised
$-1.05
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 41- YES
Will Spain win on 2025-11-18?
70 shares @ 84.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 18, 2025$0.00
$-58.84
- ALLIANCE
Counter-Strike: Alliance vs 9INE (BO3)
24 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 13, 2025$0.00
$-11.46
- SUNS
Suns vs. Warriors
17 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-10.06
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-03-18?
14 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-03-22?
13 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- NETS
Nets vs. Trail Blazers
10 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will FC Seoul vs. Gwangju FC end in a draw?
10 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Will CA Banfield vs. CA Unión end in a draw?
10 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-2.80
- 76ERS
Thunder vs. 76ers
9 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 23, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- BULLS
Heat vs. Bulls
8 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 22, 2025$0.00
$-4.75
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYFK Oleksandriya vs. RNK Veres Rivne: Both Teams to Score$2.72Apr 20, 10:36 UTC
- TRADESELLMadrid Open, Qualification: Andrea Pellegrino vs Martin Damm$2.72Apr 20, 09:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYMadrid Open, Qualification: Andrea Pellegrino vs Martin Damm$2.51Apr 20, 09:12 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-04-19?$2.51Apr 19, 15:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-04-19?$1.63Apr 19, 13:31 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Ipswich Town FC vs. Middlesbrough FC end in a draw?$1.63Apr 19, 13:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ipswich Town FC vs. Middlesbrough FC end in a draw?$1.26Apr 19, 12:45 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-04-18?$1.26Apr 19, 12:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-04-18?$9.44Apr 19, 12:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill US Cremonese vs. Torino FC end in a draw?$9.44Apr 19, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Cremonese vs. Torino FC end in a draw?$5.70Apr 19, 11:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Gamba Ōsaka vs. Fagiano Okayama end in a draw?$5.70Apr 19, 08:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Gamba Ōsaka vs. Fagiano Okayama end in a draw?$4.15Apr 19, 07:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Adelaide United FC win on 2026-04-19?$4.15Apr 19, 07:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Adelaide United FC win on 2026-04-19?$3.48Apr 19, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Macarthur FC win on 2026-04-19?$2.00Apr 19, 06:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Central Coast Mariners FC win on 2026-04-18?$5.48Apr 19, 05:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Central Coast Mariners FC win on 2026-04-18?$4.86Apr 19, 05:43 UTC
- TRADESELLBlaublitz Akita vs. Yokohama FC: Both Teams to Score$1.98Apr 19, 05:43 UTC
- TRADESELLBlaublitz Akita vs. Yokohama FC: Both Teams to Score$0.66Apr 19, 05:37 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $4.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 18, 02:45 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 20, 10:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".