Powerless-Participant
0xfb61ffc82d9c349d84994be2b0e516268d262c61
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
48
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-192.63
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 48- YES
Will FC Porto win on 2026-02-02?
84 shares @ 23.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-19.75
- OVER
Udinese Calcio vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5
68 shares @ 33.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-23.00
- OVER
Athletic Club vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol: O/U 2.5
49 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- OVER
Gil Vicente FC vs. Vitória SC: O/U 2.5
47 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-21.30
- OVER
Real Oviedo vs. Girona FC: O/U 2.5
38 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 3.5
33 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-01-31?
31 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Stade Rennais FC 1901 win on 2026-01-31?
19 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- KINGS
Kings vs. Celtics
15 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-2.78
- NO
Will AFC Bournemouth win on 2026-01-31?
15 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYGil Vicente FC vs. Vitória SC: O/U 2.5$21.66Apr 18, 18:01 UTC
- TRADESELLWill TSG 1899 Hoffenheim win on 2026-04-18?$4.37Apr 18, 18:00 UTC
- REDEEMBlackburn Rovers FC vs. Coventry City FC: O/U 1.5$11.36Apr 18, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. Parma Calcio 1913: O/U 2.5$2.00Apr 18, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill TSG 1899 Hoffenheim win on 2026-04-18?$2.00Apr 18, 13:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYBlackburn Rovers FC vs. Coventry City FC: O/U 1.5$5.00Apr 17, 19:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYAntalyaspor vs. Konyaspor: O/U 2.5$1.49Apr 17, 07:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Celta de Vigo vs. SC Freiburg: O/U 2.5$3.00Apr 16, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 1.5$9.48Apr 16, 06:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 1.5$5.76Apr 14, 20:03 UTC
- REDEEMComo 1907 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 2.5$15.76Apr 13, 07:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYComo 1907 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 2.5$8.00Apr 12, 17:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-04-09?$1.00Apr 9, 20:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AZ win on 2026-04-09?$1.00Apr 9, 20:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$5.00Apr 8, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Braga vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 2.5$2.43Apr 8, 09:20 UTC
- REDEEMMelbourne City FC vs. Central Coast Mariners FC: Both Teams to Score$3.43Apr 8, 09:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne City FC vs. Central Coast Mariners FC: Both Teams to Score$1.92Apr 7, 07:21 UTC
- REDEEMIpswich Town FC vs. Birmingham City FC: O/U 2.5$1.92Apr 7, 07:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYIpswich Town FC vs. Birmingham City FC: O/U 2.5$1.00Apr 6, 07:24 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $2.71
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 19, 10:51 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 18, 18:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".