Outgoing-World
0xfe023ea453cf6d29755fc21fb99ead111b78daba
Activity score
88/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$1.2K
Total PnL
$-37.36
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYMillwall FC vs. Hull City AFC: O/U 2.5$1.2K2h ago
- TRADESELLKnicks vs. 76ers$12.722h ago
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. 76ers$5.142h ago
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. 76ers$51.323h ago
- TRADESELLAC Milan vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 3.5$2.163h ago
- TRADEBUYAC Milan vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 3.5$2.243h ago
- TRADESELLReal Oviedo vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$1.2K6h ago
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$1.0K6h ago
- TRADESELLWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$1.6K7h ago
- TRADESELLWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$6.807h ago
- TRADEBUYWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$101.508h ago
- TRADEBUYWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$1.1K9h ago
- MAKER_REBATE$18.2322h ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$164.161d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$2.001d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$50.001d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$50.001d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$50.001d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$324.001d ago
- TRADESELLUS Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 2.5$50.001d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $275.70
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 1d ago
- Last active
- 2h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
