Offensive-Basics
0xfe8aa0642e8b9c8f1f3018168ae8e01caf832bc3
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
16
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-200.11
Realised
$14.38
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 8AM ET
529 shares @ 6.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-33.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 6AM ET
336 shares @ 10.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-35.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET
231 shares @ 19.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-45.94
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down on September 26?
200 shares @ 7.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-14.55
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down on September 27?
200 shares @ 5.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-11.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 10:00AM-10:15AM ET
167 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 5AM ET
123 shares @ 8.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-11.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 26, 5:30AM-5:45AM ET
118 shares @ 5.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 26, 2025$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Will Ethereum dip to $3400 in September?
95 shares @ 8.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 1, 2025$0.00
$-8.00
- YES
Will Ethereum reach $4800 in September?
71 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 1, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down on September 27?$4.00Sep 27, 10:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2AM ET$3.00Sep 27, 06:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2AM ET$2.00Sep 27, 06:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2AM ET$3.00Sep 27, 06:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down on September 27?$1.00Sep 27, 06:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down on September 27?$1.00Sep 27, 06:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down on September 27?$5.00Sep 27, 06:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2:00AM-2:15AM ET$2.00Sep 27, 06:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2AM ET$3.00Sep 27, 06:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$5.94Sep 26, 14:26 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$11.42Sep 26, 14:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$10.00Sep 26, 14:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$10.00Sep 26, 14:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10:00AM-10:15AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10:00AM-10:15AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10AM ET$15.00Sep 26, 14:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - September 26, 10:00AM-10:15AM ET$5.00Sep 26, 14:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $6.21
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 26, 10:33 UTC
- Last active
- Sep 27, 10:44 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".