Focused-Hectare
0xff5c95e320ac73c1f04ac1709d51465bdaa3dcf0
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-283.88
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- MAPLE LEAFS
Avalanche vs. Maple Leafs
155 shares @ 20.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-31.60
- HUMBERT
Open Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino
140 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-92.08
- YES
Will Torino FC win on 2026-02-04?
61 shares @ 2.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.41
- UNDER
Timberwolves vs. Grizzlies: O/U 232.5
60 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-28.80
- UNDER
Rockets vs. Pacers: O/U 219.5
59 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-28.27
- UNDER
Bulls vs. Heat: O/U 238.5
50 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-24.00
- UNDER
Pelicans vs. 76ers: O/U 234.5
50 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-22.50
- UNDER
Hawks vs. Pacers: O/U 234.5
50 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-24.00
- LIQUID
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs G2 (BO3) - IEM Krakow Play-In
36 shares @ 59.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-21.23
- UNDER
Raptors vs. Magic: O/U 219.5
20 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Torino FC win on 2026-02-04?$0.03Feb 4, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Torino FC win on 2026-02-04?$1.38Feb 4, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$11.85Feb 4, 19:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$6.35Feb 4, 19:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$66.00Feb 4, 19:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$1.98Feb 4, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$1.98Feb 4, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$1.98Feb 4, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYOpen Sud de France: Ugo Humbert vs Adrian Mannarino$1.94Feb 4, 19:57 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$47.82Feb 3, 22:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$8.40Feb 3, 21:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$13.58Feb 3, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$3.80Feb 3, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$3.80Feb 3, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$7.60Feb 3, 21:47 UTC
- TRADESELLRockets vs. Pacers: O/U 219.5$0.53Feb 3, 02:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Grizzlies: O/U 232.5$5.42Feb 3, 00:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Grizzlies: O/U 232.5$23.37Feb 3, 00:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYRockets vs. Pacers: O/U 219.5$20.24Feb 3, 00:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYRockets vs. Pacers: O/U 219.5$0.92Feb 3, 00:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $20.71
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 29, 20:52 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 4, 21:06 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".