Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming (BO5) - VCT China Playoffs
11 markets in this event family · $561.6K 24h volume · $656.2K liquidity. Share the URL anywhere — the rich preview card shows the cluster's biggest mover with one glance.
$562.0K
11 markets · liq $655.8K
0.0pp
Mean |24h move|
0
Markets ≥5pp 24h
$0.00
0 trades ≥$5k
9
Active UMA dispute / pending
11
Settlement positioning risk
- UMA proposedMap Handicap: EDG (-1.5) vs XLG Gaming (+1.5)
- UMA proposedMap Handicap: EDG (-2.5) vs XLG Gaming (+2.5)
- UMA proposedValorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming (BO5) - VCT China Playoffs
- UMA proposedValorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 3 Winner
- UMA proposedValorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 4 Winner
Verify resolution before treating any move as news. Use /api/x402/v1/markets/{slug}/resolution-risk for the full extraction.
All markets in this cluster
11Map Handicap: EDG (-1.5) vs XLG Gaming (+1.5)
Vol $300.53 · Liq $13.0K
Map Handicap: EDG (-2.5) vs XLG Gaming (+2.5)
Vol $1.9K · Liq $57.7K
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming (BO5) - VCT China Playoffs
Vol $217.7K · Liq $127.5K
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 1 Winner
Vol $43.1K · Liq $0.00
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 2 Winner
Vol $147.6K · Liq $0.00
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 3 Winner
Vol $87.1K · Liq $342.2K
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 4 Winner
Vol $62.6K · Liq $41.0K
Games Total: O/U 3.5
Vol $1.2K · Liq $31.6K
Games Total: O/U 4.5
Vol $403.15 · Liq $13.7K
Map Handicap: XLG (-1.5) vs EDward Gaming (+1.5)
Vol $55.00 · Liq $13.5K
Map Handicap: XLG (-2.5) vs EDward Gaming (+2.5)
Vol $55.00 · Liq $15.5K
| Market | Prob | Δ24h | Vol | Liq |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Handicap: EDG (-1.5) vs XLG Gaming (+1.5) | 0¢ | 0.0 | $300.53 | $13.0K |
| Map Handicap: EDG (-2.5) vs XLG Gaming (+2.5) | 0¢ | 0.0 | $1.9K | $57.7K |
| Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming (BO5) - VCT China Playoffs | 100¢ | 0.0 | $217.7K | $127.5K |
| Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 1 Winner | 0¢ | 0.0 | $43.1K | $0.00 |
| Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 2 Winner | 100¢ | 0.0 | $147.6K | $0.00 |
| Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 3 Winner | 100¢ | 0.0 | $87.1K | $342.2K |
| Valorant: EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 4 Winner | 0¢ | 0.0 | $62.6K | $41.0K |
| Games Total: O/U 3.5 | 100¢ | 0.0 | $1.2K | $31.6K |
| Games Total: O/U 4.5 | 100¢ | 0.0 | $403.15 | $13.7K |
| Map Handicap: XLG (-1.5) vs EDward Gaming (+1.5) | 0¢ | 0.0 | $55.00 | $13.5K |
| Map Handicap: XLG (-2.5) vs EDward Gaming (+2.5) | 0¢ | 0.0 | $55.00 | $15.5K |
About this event
This market refers to the Valorant Grand final match between EDward Gaming and XLG Gaming in the VCT China Playoffs, initially scheduled for May 10 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "EDward Gaming" if EDward Gaming win the match against XLG Gaming. This market will resolve to "XLG Gaming" if XLG Gaming win the match against EDward Gaming. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.