Dota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Cloud Dawning (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs

• 01
  Volume pressure

  Light volume — move on a thin book

  Only $12.3k traded against $108.8k of visible liquidity (0.11× turnover). Treat the move as low-confidence until volume confirms.

• 02
  Active signal

  Resolution-risk signal firing

  Market has reached expiry. Watch the UMA dispute window.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

This market refers to the Dota 2 Lower bracket quarterfinal 2 match between Yakult Brothers and Cloud Dawning in the ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs, initially scheduled for May 2 at 1:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Yakult Brothers" if Yakult Brothers win the match against Cloud Dawning. This market will resolve to "Cloud Dawning" if Cloud Dawning win the match against Yakult Brothers. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.