Dota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Nemiga Gaming - Game 1 Winner

1. 1

   Up 42pp over 24h

   Now 100¢; flat in the last hour.

2. 2

   Resolution-risk signal firing

   Expires in 2h with open resolution ambiguity.

3. 3

   Expiry in 2h

   Market resolves within 72 hours — the move likely reflects information about the resolution event itself rather than longer-horizon repricing. Verify the resolution source.

4. 4

   UMA status: proposed

   An open UMA dispute or pending oracle vote can move price independently of underlying odds. Wait for settlement before treating the line as the market view.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

Prose narration of the same metrics shown in the structured breakdown above. Cites only the market data on this page — no news, no predictions. Use the structured factors as the canonical answer; this is here for readability.

No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market.

This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket quarterfinal 2 match between Zero Tenacity and Nemiga Gaming in the DreamLeague Division 2 Playoffs, initially scheduled for April 24 at 9:30AM ET. This market will resolve to "Zero Tenacity" if Zero Tenacity win Game 1 against Nemiga Gaming. This market will resolve to "Nemiga Gaming" if Nemiga Gaming win Game 1 against Zero Tenacity. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.