Immaculate-Plan
0x00829c04b441580b0ba5210c5b080c7d22f0e801
Wallet digest
Activity score
40/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
40
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.2K
Realised
$43.35
Win rate
25%
4 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 40- YES
Will Blackburn Rovers FC win on 2026-01-01?
500 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 31, 10:15AM-10:30AM ET
367 shares @ 5.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5
354 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-251.00
- OVER
RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 2.5
300 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 3, 2026$0.00
$-180.00
- YES
Will Al Nassr Saudi Club win on 2026-01-02?
294 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 2, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-01-03?
290 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 3, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
Levante UD vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 1.5
253 shares @ 55.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-140.93
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-01-01?
247 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-94.00
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Leeds United FC: O/U 1.5
231 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-131.76
- OVER
Real Oviedo vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 1.5
210 shares @ 72.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-151.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-05-30?$11.55May 30, 13:09 UTC
- TRADESELLBase FDV above $4B one day after launch?$1.04May 22, 09:38 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Base launch a token by June 30, 2026?$0.67May 22, 09:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Freiburg win the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League?$10.24May 20, 19:13 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Club Atlético de Madrid (-1.5)$1.18May 9, 16:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Club Atlético de Madrid (-1.5)$73.38May 9, 16:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Base launch a token by June 30, 2026?$1.18May 9, 16:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYBase FDV above $4B one day after launch?$1.14May 9, 16:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSevilla FC vs. RCD Espanyol de Barcelona: O/U 1.5$88.14May 9, 16:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSevilla FC vs. RCD Espanyol de Barcelona: O/U 1.5$30.59May 9, 15:31 UTC
- REDEEMRCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 1.5$16.43May 3, 23:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYRCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 1.5$10.09May 3, 19:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Beşiktaş JK win on 2026-04-27?$65.00Apr 27, 17:39 UTC
- TRADESELLBeşiktaş JK vs. Fatih Karagümrük SK: O/U 2.5$55.88Apr 27, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeşiktaş JK vs. Fatih Karagümrük SK: O/U 2.5$89.00Apr 27, 16:03 UTC
- TRADESELLAlanyaspor vs. Samsunspor: O/U 2.5$33.50Apr 27, 14:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYAlanyaspor vs. Samsunspor: O/U 2.5$100.00Apr 27, 14:04 UTC
- TRADESELLAC Milan vs. Juventus FC: O/U 1.5$42.23Apr 26, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLOlympique de Marseille vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$44.51Apr 26, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$100.00Apr 26, 19:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $78.31
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 8, 19:13 UTC
- Last active
- May 30, 13:09 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 4 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".