Virtual-Quota
0x0aa431f69ecfb3798660945c799d8bedb598ee2d
Activity score
86/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$347.95
Total PnL
$-0.53
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill gas hit (High) $4.40 by May 31?$348.623h ago
- REDEEMWill gas hit (High) $4.35 by May 31?$348.003h ago
- TRADEBUYWill gas hit (High) $4.35 by May 31?$85.461d ago
- TRADEBUYWill gas hit (High) $4.35 by May 31?$250.001d ago
- REDEEMWill gas hit (Low) $3.15 by March 31?$336.009d ago
- TRADEBUYWill gas hit (Low) $3.15 by March 31?$335.3333d ago
- REDEEMWill Kanye West release an album in 2026?$336.0033d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Kanye West release an album in 2026?$324.4644d ago
- TRADESELLWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 14,000 in 2026?$40.4744d ago
- REDEEMWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 12,000 in 2026?$71.0044d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 14,000 in 2026?$26.8446d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 12,000 in 2026?$18.5046d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 14,000 in 2026?$16.4746d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the DFM Real Estate Index hit 12,000 in 2026?$7.7746d ago
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $70,000 in March?$281.4761d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $70,000 in March?$290.0061d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 12
- Avg trade size
- $168.78
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 61d ago
- Last active
- 3h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".