Hidden-Toe
0x0f0debdb1f9a82683dd9be81858e86b49e2b9115
Activity score
69/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
50
Open notional
$70.69
Total PnL
$-525.02
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 50- YES
Will Vitality win IEM Cologne Major 2026?
37 shares @ 54.0¢·now 57.5¢·exp Jun 21, 2026$21.00
$1.28
- VITALITY
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs BC.Game Esports (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A
21 shares @ 94.0¢·now 93.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$19.79
$-0.21
- ASTRALIS
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs Astralis (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B
14 shares @ 70.0¢·now 70.5¢·exp May 12, 2026$10.07
$0.07
- FUT ESPORTS
Counter-Strike: NRG vs FUT Esports (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A
12 shares @ 83.0¢·now 82.5¢·exp May 12, 2026$9.94
$-0.06
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Passion UA (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B
11 shares @ 92.0¢·now 91.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$9.89
$-0.11
- TEAM FALCONS
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs Spirit (BO3) - IEM Rio Playoffs
64 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-38.13
- TEAM FALCONS
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs PARIVISION (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam Playoffs
54 shares @ 63.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-34.30
- LIQUID
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs Passion UA (BO3) - ESL Pro League Stage 1
33 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Team Spirit win ESL Pro League Season 23?
30 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- PARIVISION
Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs Heroic (BO3) - ESL Pro League Stage 1
29 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 5, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: NRG vs FUT Esports (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A$10.054h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Liquid vs Astralis (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B$10.094h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Passion UA (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B$10.024h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs BC.Game Esports (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A$20.044h ago
- REDEEMWill Vitality win BLAST Rivals Fort Worth 2026?$30.303d ago
- REDEEMGames Total: O/U 3.5$81.273d ago
- TRADEBUYGames Total: O/U 3.5$28.553d ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality (BO5) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$29.453d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality (BO5) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$30.173d ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$29.354d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$27.064d ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$26.994d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$20.164d ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Ground Zero vs THUNDER dOWNUNDER (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Oceania Cup #4 Playoffs$10.535d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Ground Zero vs THUNDER dOWNUNDER (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Oceania Cup #4 Playoffs$10.015d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Astralis vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$13.145d ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$13.165d ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Vitality vs G2 (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group A$20.005d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs G2 (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group A$7.036d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$10.076d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $18.07
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 22d ago
- Last active
- 4h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
