Jagged-Sound
0x15b1a5156f5e37722e6976295af858b8a08e33aa
Wallet digest
Activity score
93/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
15
Open notional
$200.00
Total PnL
$-10.9K
Realised
$339.24
Win rate
100%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- USYK
Glory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven
200 shares @ 31.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$200.00
$138.00
- YES
Ranger FDV above $50M one day after launch?
36000 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$0.00
$-4.0K
- YES
Ranger FDV above $40M one day after launch?
30000 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$0.00
$-4.5K
- YES
Ranger FDV above $30M one day after launch?
4000 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$0.00
$-1.4K
- YES
Will BetBoom Team win The International 2025 Tournament?
1820 shares @ 4.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 14, 2025$0.00
$-87.46
- PARIVISION
Dota 2: PARIVISION vs. Xtreme Gaming
1777 shares @ 12.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 16, 2025$0.00
$-226.93
- PARIVISION
Dota 2: PARIVISION vs. Team Falcons
1651 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 15, 2025$0.00
$-223.23
- YES
Will Xtreme Gaming win The International 2025 Tournament?
1256 shares @ 43.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 14, 2025$0.00
$-546.36
- BETBOOM TEAM
Dota 2: BetBoom Team vs. Xtreme Gaming
714 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 15, 2025$0.00
$-78.56
- HEROIC
Dota 2: BetBoom Team vs. Heroic
647 shares @ 22.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 15, 2025$0.00
$-147.68
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYGlory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven$63.28May 23, 23:05 UTC
- TRADESELLGlory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven$0.92May 23, 22:50 UTC
- TRADESELLGlory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven$60.07May 23, 22:50 UTC
- TRADESELLGlory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven$1.73May 23, 22:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYGlory in Giza: Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven$23.75May 23, 20:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYMen's Group C - USA vs. Germany$50.00Feb 15, 19:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$7.65Jan 10, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$61.80Jan 10, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $40M one day after launch?$2.3KJan 10, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $40M one day after launch?$105.12Jan 10, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$1.1KJan 10, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $40M one day after launch?$26.55Jan 10, 18:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $40M one day after launch?$1.5KJan 10, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$55.00Jan 10, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$1.61Jan 10, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$0.73Jan 10, 17:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $40M one day after launch?$490.20Jan 10, 17:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$201.96Jan 10, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $50M one day after launch?$2.4KJan 10, 17:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanger FDV above $30M one day after launch?$196.64Jan 10, 17:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $244.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 14, 11:12 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 23:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".