Torn-Faithful
0x16905fb8633a07853b532709572d2a0de0158c4d
Activity score
98/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$2.2K
Total PnL
$295.05
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 218.5$700.597m ago
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 220.5$2.0K7m ago
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$488.0021m ago
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 219.5$82.5821m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$468.782h ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 219.5$49.472h ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 219.5$31.932h ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 218.5$672.982h ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 220.5$2.0K2h ago
- REDEEMWill the lowest temperature in Hong Kong be 20°C on April 30?$34.803h ago
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 27°C on May 1?$359.963h ago
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 26°C on May 1?$1.1K3h ago
- REDEEMMagic vs. Pistons$3.0K1d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$1.611d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$11.501d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$1.261d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$5.021d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$58.951d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$614.191d ago
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$1.1K1d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 28
- Avg trade size
- $496.96
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 3d ago
- Last active
- 7m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".