Defiant-Terminal
0x27e7c4de1bd625e3147595922e8f0734aac31e0f
Activity score
77/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$53.44
Total PnL
$0.03
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $87,000 on May 11?$53.415h ago
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $4,000 in April?$53.425h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $4,000 in April?$53.3718d ago
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $1,500 April 6-12?$53.3718d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,500 April 6-12?$53.3232d ago
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $1.90 March 30-April 5?$53.3232d ago
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $1.90 March 30-April 5?$53.2739d ago
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $0.40 in March?$53.2739d ago
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $0.40 in March?$53.1649d ago
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $0.80 March 16-22?$53.1649d ago
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $0.80 March 16-22?$53.1151d ago
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $190 in February?$53.1051d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $190 in February?$53.0576d ago
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $102,000 January 26-1?$53.0576d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $102,000 January 26-1?$53.00102d ago
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $88,000 on January 28?$5.2K102d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $88,000 on January 28?$3.2K104d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $407.30
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 104d ago
- Last active
- 5h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
