Damaged-Archrival
0x29b7a9a6ce50f394b3f1a1ee4d8874e7576f4108
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
0
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$0.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
No open positions.
Recent activity
- REDEEMSpread: Sabres (-1.5)$650.0035m ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Sabres (-1.5)$381.752h ago
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. 76ers$0.0039d ago
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. 76ers$2.3K39d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$0.0039d ago
- REDEEMColorado Rockies vs. Toronto Blue Jays$0.0039d ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. 76ers$1.4K39d ago
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Toronto Blue Jays$3.3K41d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$2.4K41d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$5.2K41d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$90.0042d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$2.5842d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$4.6K42d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$50.0042d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Atlanta Braves (-1.5)$249.5042d ago
- REDEEMUS military action against Iran before July?$0.0042d ago
- REDEEMDubai Tennis Championships: Andrey Rublev vs Tallon Griekspoor$0.0042d ago
- REDEEMPelicans vs. Pistons$3.1K44d ago
- TRADEBUYPelicans vs. Pistons$2.0K47d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Cavaliers (-10.5)$0.0047d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $1.1K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 75d ago
- Last active
- 35m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
