Windy-Hull
0x2b2bb3976a1e11efc5e2bd84cad8409a92c7b71e
Wallet digest
Activity score
69/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
27
Open notional
$75.29
Total PnL
$-1.7K
Realised
$-139.88
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 27- YES
Will the Iranian regime fall by June 30?
3073 shares @ 11.6¢·now 2.5¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$75.29
$-280.46
- UP
S&P 500 (SPX) Opens Up or Down on March 2?
10398 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-67.69
- YES
Will the Iranian regime fall by January 31?
1000 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 27, 3:20PM-3:25PM ET
912 shares @ 14.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-136.44
- YES
US x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?
400 shares @ 76.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-304.00
- YES
Will the Iranian regime fall by May 31?
300 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2026$0.00
$-10.50
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 26, 7:35PM-7:40PM ET
300 shares @ 18.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-54.99
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 27, 3:25PM-3:30PM ET
206 shares @ 47.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-98.44
- YES
US x Iran diplomatic meeting by April 30, 2026?
200 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-122.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 27, 3:40AM-3:45AM ET
200 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-19.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by April 30, 2026?$122.00Apr 24, 18:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?$127.49Apr 24, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?$151.99Apr 24, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?$16.92Apr 24, 11:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?$7.60Apr 24, 11:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$312.89Apr 24, 11:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$80.00Apr 21, 18:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$96.00Apr 21, 18:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$96.24Apr 21, 18:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$32.00Apr 20, 11:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$48.00Apr 20, 11:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by May 31?$10.50Apr 20, 10:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$56.00Apr 19, 13:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$100.00Apr 8, 14:01 UTC
- REDEEMUS x Iran ceasefire by April 30?$0.00Apr 8, 14:00 UTC
- REDEEMUS x Iran ceasefire by April 30?$781.64Apr 8, 14:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$2.56Mar 4, 22:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$3.84Mar 4, 22:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$6.39Mar 4, 22:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$4.48Mar 4, 22:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $92.02
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 27, 20:23 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 24, 18:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".