Disgusting-Landmine
0x3552d1ca59bf6171f330421c936c11832504f07b
Wallet digest
Activity score
70/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
180
Open notional
$126.37
Total PnL
$-2.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 180- YES
Will the San Antonio Spurs win the 2026 NBA Finals?
120 shares @ 8.3¢·now 47.4¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$57.16
$47.16
- YES
Will the Detroit Lions win the 2027 NFL league championship?
615 shares @ 4.1¢·now 3.9¢·exp Mar 31, 2027$24.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the Denver Broncos win the 2027 NFL league championship?
694 shares @ 3.6¢·now 3.4¢·exp Mar 31, 2027$23.26
$-1.74
- YES
Will the New England Patriots win the 2027 NFL league championship?
334 shares @ 4.5¢·now 4.3¢·exp Mar 31, 2027$14.19
$-0.81
- YES
Will Joe Mazzulla win the 2025–2026 NBA Coach of the Year?
8 shares @ 12.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$7.75
$6.75
- YES
Will the Minnesota Timberwolves win the 2026 NBA Finals?
428 shares @ 2.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$0.00
$-12.50
- YES
Will the Orlando Magic win the NBA Eastern Conference Finals?
417 shares @ 3.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 13, 2026$0.00
$-16.00
- YES
Will the Golden State Warriors win the 2026 NBA Finals?
252 shares @ 1.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
Will the Houston Rockets win the 2026 NBA Finals?
250 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will the Miami Heat win the NBA Eastern Conference Finals?
227 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 13, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the New England Patriots win the 2027 NFL league championship?$15.43Jun 2, 04:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Detroit Lions win the 2027 NFL league championship?$25.72Jun 2, 04:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Denver Broncos win the 2027 NFL league championship?$25.72Jun 2, 04:31 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Thunder (-16.5)$10.17May 18, 08:46 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Pistons (-3.5)$40.82May 18, 08:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill Shai Gilgeous-Alexander win the 2025–2026 NBA MVP?$45.45May 18, 08:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Thunder (-16.5)$4.86May 5, 09:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Pistons (-3.5)$20.31May 5, 09:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Pistons$20.35May 5, 09:22 UTC
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Nuggets$24.55Apr 28, 08:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Nuggets$20.00Apr 26, 05:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Minnesota Timberwolves win the NBA Western Conference Finals?$2.00Apr 26, 04:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Minnesota Timberwolves win the 2026 NBA Finals?$2.50Apr 26, 04:53 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Pistons (-2.5)$1.01Apr 25, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYPistons vs. Magic$3.00Apr 25, 19:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Pistons (-2.5)$5.00Apr 25, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Orlando Magic win the NBA Eastern Conference Finals?$6.00Apr 25, 18:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Nuggets (-7.5)$10.00Apr 20, 20:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYHawks vs. Knicks$10.00Apr 20, 19:42 UTC
- REDEEM76ers vs. Celtics: O/U 213.5$19.32Apr 20, 19:37 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 23
- Avg trade size
- $12.59
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 25, 19:44 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 2, 04:31 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".