Mysterious-Regret
0x37106f85339276f752b8e6d0fedc726dbc74a384
Wallet digest
Activity score
78/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$208.33
Total PnL
$-16.85
Realised
$-10.78
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) hit (HIGH) $510 in May?
104 shares @ 95.9¢·now 97.1¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$101.23
$1.23
- NO
Will Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) hit (LOW) $50 in May?
100 shares @ 98.0¢·now 98.6¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$98.60
$0.60
- NO
Will S&P 500 (SPY) hit (HIGH) $750 in May?
20 shares @ 82.0¢·now 42.5¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$8.50
$-7.90
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 31°C or higher on May 13?$1.591h ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 31°C or higher on May 13?$4.674h ago
- TRADESELLWill S&P 500 (SPY) hit (HIGH) $750 in May?$8.984d ago
- TRADESELLWill S&P 500 (SPY) hit (HIGH) $750 in May?$4.567d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) hit (LOW) $50 in May?$98.008d ago
- TRADEBUYWill S&P 500 (SPY) hit (HIGH) $750 in May?$41.308d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) hit (HIGH) $510 in May?$100.168d ago
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $680 end of January?$9.4577d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $680 end of January?$8.00104d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $33.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 104d ago
- Last active
- 1h ago
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
