Popular-Pottery
0x3a04175281029a72a1136d6d5feb5f5c8adef57b
Activity score
63/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$54.30
Total PnL
$-2.8K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $150 May 11-17?$54.9111h ago
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $3.00 in April?$54.9211h ago
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $3.00 in April?$54.8715d ago
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $64,000 April 6-12?$54.8715d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $64,000 April 6-12?$54.8229d ago
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $74,000 March 30-April 5?$54.8229d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $74,000 March 30-April 5?$54.7737d ago
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $150 in March?$54.7737d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $150 in March?$54.6649d ago
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $0.90 March 16-22?$54.6649d ago
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $0.90 March 16-22?$54.5552d ago
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $5,000 in February?$54.5452d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $5,000 in February?$54.4977d ago
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $78,000 January 19-25?$54.4977d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $78,000 January 19-25?$54.44109d ago
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $90,000 on January 22?$2.4K111d ago
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $90,000 on January 22?$1.1K111d ago
- SPLITWill the price of Bitcoin be above $90,000 on January 22?$5.6K111d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $393.43
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 111d ago
- Last active
- 11h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
