Wallet profile

Tragic-Park

0x3ab5ad27c676c4be1218397912eab5396e6de56f

activity 70/100

Wallet digest

active

Activity score

70/100

Performance measurable

Open positions

170

Open notional

$3.8K

Total PnL

$-40.5K

Realised

$3.5K

Win rate

38%

16 closed

Guardrail: wallet activity is not profitability, and large trades are not smart money. Use the sample, concentration, and copy-risk dimensions before reading this profile as meaningful.

Largest open positions

showing 10 of 170

Recent activity

Persistent ledger timeline

persistent

No trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.

Wallet edge sanity

Do not mirror

27/100
read-only

Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.

PnL is mostly mark-to-market

Open-position PnL can disappear if liquidity, exit price, or final resolution changes.

High mirror risk

Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.

Late-entry profile

Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.

Required before treating wallet flow as useful

Resolved-only performance

38% win rate over 16 closed markets.

Copy-lag simulation

A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.

Liquidity and exit

Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.

Resolution-source risk

The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.

Survivorship bias

Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.

Wallet intelligence filter

Watch only

0/100
no PredictFoliopaper-only

Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.

Wallet signal
review

47 live trades, 3 ledger trades, copy-risk 74/100.

Resolved-only track record
review

16 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.

Cost / slippage
missing

No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.

Resolution risk
missing

No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.

Market liquidity
missing

No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.

Copy-lag simulation
missing

No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.

Paper-only attribution
missing

No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.

Ledger intelligence

persistent

7d volume

$0.00

0 trades

30d volume

$0.00

0 trades

Buy share

44%

Sample

limited

3 ledger trades

Top market concentration

Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 30?

$24.0K · 56% of recorded whale volume

Recorded market concentration

Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 30?56% of recorded volume$24.0KWill Spencer Pratt win the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election?28% of recorded volume$12.0KWill Rebecca Shepherd win the 2026 Makerfield by-election?16% of recorded volume$6.9K

Profile dimensions

Activity72 / 100

Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.

Performance confidence53 / 100

How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.

Specialization0 / 100

Share of trades concentrated in their top category.

Early-entry10 / 100

Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.

Copy-risk74 / 100

How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.

Trades (all time)
47
Avg trade size
$248.14
Top category
—
Category concentration
0%
First seen
Jul 23, 11:28 UTC
Last active
Jul 29, 14:50 UTC
Win rate sample
16 closed

The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.

View on PolymarketView on Polygonscan
updated 16:12:04 UTC·src:Polymarket Data