Low-Fat
0x3c2fe37102a58cdfbd807658968517d55a2f9765
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
14
Open notional
$481.28
Total PnL
$-773.29
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 14- YES
Will Arsenal win the 2025–26 English Premier League?
200 shares @ 90.0¢·now 86.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$173.00
$-7.00
- NO
Will Avengers: Doomsday be the top grossing movie of 2026?
200 shares @ 85.0¢·now 81.5¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$162.98
$-7.02
- YES
Will Anthropic's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.5T by December 31?
300 shares @ 31.0¢·now 31.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$94.50
$1.50
- AFC BOURNEMOUTH
Spread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)
80 shares @ 64.0¢·now 63.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$50.80
$-0.40
- KT ROLSTER
Game Handicap: KT (-1.5) vs HANJIN BRION (+1.5)
570 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-359.10
- OVER
Lakers vs. Thunder: O/U 214.5
300 shares @ 54.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-162.95
- YES
Will the Denver Nuggets win the NBA Western Conference Finals?
250 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 16, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- ROCKETS
Spread: Rockets (-4.5)
100 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-54.96
- HORNETS
Spread: Hornets (-3.5)
98 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-48.25
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 4.5
73 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-41.46
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)$51.75May 19, 12:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Anthropic's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.5T by December 31?$95.57May 19, 12:11 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: Both Teams to Score$30.00May 18, 22:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: Both Teams to Score$20.30May 18, 17:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Thunder: O/U 221.5$20.70May 18, 16:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5$20.60May 18, 16:55 UTC
- REDEEMCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 205.5$141.00May 18, 05:53 UTC
- REDEEMMap Handicap: NAVI (-1.5) vs GamerLegion (+1.5)$399.99May 18, 03:15 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Tōkyō win on 2026-05-16?$0.00May 18, 01:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.00May 18, 01:13 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$150.00May 17, 17:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYMap Handicap: NAVI (-1.5) vs GamerLegion (+1.5)$274.60May 17, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$97.04May 17, 13:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$66.85May 17, 13:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 205.5$71.56May 17, 13:16 UTC
- REDEEMMap Handicap: FAL (-1.5) vs magic (+1.5)$80.65May 16, 17:19 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: BNK FEARX vs Nongshim Red Force (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$79.37May 16, 16:07 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MOUZ vs Spirit (BO3) - PGL Astana Playoffs$59.99May 16, 15:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYMap Handicap: FAL (-1.5) vs magic (+1.5)$50.57May 16, 12:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: BNK FEARX vs Nongshim Red Force (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$50.55May 16, 11:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $94.63
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 30, 16:46 UTC
- Last active
- May 19, 12:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".