Gripping-Mother
0x3faa7370c04e10f718d730995ef3c0e1b0fffeb4
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
23
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2025-11-04?
533 shares @ 37.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid win on 2025-12-07?
397 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-310.00
- YES
Will Alexander Mutiso win the 2025 Men's New York City Marathon?
300 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 2, 2025$0.00
$-63.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - October 16, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET
298 shares @ 13.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 16, 2025$0.00
$-40.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET
268 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-16.97
- NO
Will lighter perform an airdrop by December 31?
222 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-82.09
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-01-11?
190 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-55.10
- YES
Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?
153 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-66.00
- NO
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) beat quarterly earnings?
137 shares @ 14.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 19, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2025-11-04?
123 shares @ 40.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-50.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-25?$185.00Feb 26, 05:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-25?$109.15Feb 25, 16:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-17?$296.22Feb 18, 02:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-17?$16.08Feb 17, 20:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-17?$128.38Feb 17, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$66.00Feb 12, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:55PM-1:00PM ET$20.00Feb 12, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:50PM-12:55PM ET$5.00Feb 12, 17:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:50PM-12:55PM ET$10.00Feb 12, 17:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET$2.00Feb 12, 17:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET$5.00Feb 12, 17:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 12, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET$10.00Feb 12, 17:48 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $8 before 2027?$220.00Jan 17, 08:03 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$37.95Jan 17, 02:03 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$200.00Jan 16, 18:45 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$7.04Jan 16, 17:43 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$250.00Jan 16, 11:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$30.73Jan 15, 17:23 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$81.00Jan 14, 09:26 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter reach $6 before 2027?$135.00Jan 14, 03:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $115.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 3, 16:44 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 26, 05:39 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".