Cheery-Measurement
0x459e15a2fb577599f2218c982d6b5d179e2d9109
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
80
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-724.72
Realised
$-79.61
Win rate
38%
8 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 80- NO
Will the US strike Somalia next?
7000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$0.00
$-14.00
- UNDER
Hurkacz vs. Bergs: Match O/U 40.5
2535 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-28.00
- STRUFF
Set Handicap: Struff (-2.5) vs Kopriva (+2.5)
727 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-10.09
- HURKACZ
Set Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)
632 shares @ 1.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-9.30
- UNDER 3.5
Hurkacz vs. Bergs: Total Sets O/U 3.5
255 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-9.07
- CAPITALS
Capitals vs. Oilers
154 shares @ 86.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-133.19
- OKSAVINGSBANK BRION
LoL: KT Rolster vs OKSavingsBank BRION (BO3) - LCK Cup Group Stage
133 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- LAKERS
Lakers vs. Knicks
107 shares @ 35.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-37.86
- SZABO
Transylvania Open, Qualification: Lucrezia Stefanini vs Briana Szabo
83 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will the Denver Broncos win Super Bowl 2026?
76 shares @ 9.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLHurkacz vs. Bergs: Total Sets O/U 3.5$0.01Feb 11, 13:34 UTC
- TRADESELLHurkacz vs. Bergs: Match O/U 40.5$0.01Feb 11, 13:34 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.04Feb 10, 12:22 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.80Feb 10, 01:26 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 03:27 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 03:27 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.00Feb 9, 03:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.00Feb 9, 03:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 03:25 UTC
- TRADESELLHurkacz vs. Bergs: Total Sets O/U 3.5$0.00Feb 9, 03:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 02:44 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 02:44 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 9, 02:44 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.00Feb 9, 02:44 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.00Feb 9, 02:44 UTC
- TRADESELLHurkacz vs. Bergs: Match O/U 40.5$0.03Feb 6, 02:20 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Hurkacz (-2.5) vs Bergs (+2.5)$0.00Feb 5, 11:08 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 3, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLHurkacz vs. Bergs: Match O/U 40.5$0.03Feb 3, 08:06 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Samsonova (-1.5) vs Siegemund (+1.5)$0.00Feb 2, 19:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $20.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 1, 13:44 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 11, 13:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 8 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".