Tricky-Haven
0x48b5aeb722a8489f8bab34b6a3a1209b70f99167
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
5
Open notional
$183.07
Total PnL
$-186.92
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- UNDER
Manchester City FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 2.5
267 shares @ 30.0¢·now 68.5¢·exp May 9, 2026$182.67
$102.67
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-09?
512 shares @ 39.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.26
$-199.74
- YES
Manchester United FC leading at halftime?
228 shares @ 30.7¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.11
$-69.89
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5
45 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.02
$-9.98
- YES
Sunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: Both Teams to Score
31 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.02
$-9.98
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 2.5$81.681h ago
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: Both Teams to Score$10.203h ago
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5$10.233h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-09?$101.983h ago
- TRADEBUYManchester United FC leading at halftime?$20.473h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-09?$101.624h ago
- TRADEBUYManchester United FC leading at halftime?$50.954h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $53.88
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 4h ago
- Last active
- 1h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
