Second-Hand-Scorn
0x5d5ebe07e4ef91beef558605383cef07d4347004
Wallet digest
Activity score
78/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$986.51
Total PnL
$-11.5K
Realised
$825.18
Win rate
57%
14 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- OVER
Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks: O/U 7.5
854 shares @ 88.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$854.00
$102.48
- LOS ANGELES DODGERS
Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks
133 shares @ 79.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp Jun 10, 2026$132.51
$27.30
- YES
Will Chelsea vs. PSG end in a draw?
3110 shares @ 6.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 13, 2025$0.00
$-211.32
- KINGS
Kraken vs. Kings
2864 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 5, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- YES
Will PSG beat Chelsea?
2180 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 13, 2025$0.00
$-87.20
- OVER
Toronto Blue Jays vs. Minnesota Twins: O/U 10.5
1500 shares @ 80.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-1.2K
- GIANTS
Giants vs. Padres
1410 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 28, 2025$0.00
$-88.46
- YES
Will the Cleveland Guardians win the 2025 American League Championship?
1285 shares @ 7.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will West Ham vs. Newcastle end in a draw?
1246 shares @ 23.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 2, 2025$0.00
$-297.93
- METS
Mets vs. Padres
1178 shares @ 7.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 6, 2025$0.00
$-90.20
Recent activity
- TRADESELLLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$555.05Jun 3, 04:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$53.81Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$13.00Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$11.57Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$9.50Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$0.23Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$28.96Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$28.96Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$28.96Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$1.97Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$0.74Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$1.75Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$28.96Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$146.11Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$94.20Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$72.43Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$14.01Jun 3, 04:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks: O/U 7.5$83.02Jun 3, 03:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks: O/U 7.5$8.51Jun 3, 03:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks: O/U 7.5$652.96Jun 3, 03:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $164.56
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 2, 03:14 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 3, 04:10 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 14 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".