Surprised-Dome
0x5fa3ed9443381cbc4c3f43744a951a687f6803a7
Activity score
57/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$11.77
Total PnL
$-7.82
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSabres vs. Canadiens: O/U 4.5$12.495h ago
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in London be 18°C on April 22?$12.395h ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in London be 18°C on April 22?$12.2420d ago
- TRADEBUYStars vs. Sabres: O/U 6.5$7.1626d ago
- REDEEMSenators vs. Lightning: O/U 4.5$2.1K43d ago
- TRADEBUYSenators vs. Lightning: O/U 4.5$800.0044d ago
- TRADEBUYSenators vs. Lightning: O/U 4.5$790.3044d ago
- TRADEBUYSenators vs. Lightning: O/U 4.5$79.0044d ago
- TRADESELLWill Moonshot have the top AI model at the end of June 2026?$564.6980d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Moonshot have the top AI model at the end of June 2026?$571.7480d ago
- TRADESELLWill Google (GOOGL) close above $340 on February 9?$1.8K93d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Google (GOOGL) close above $340 on February 9?$1.7K93d ago
- MERGEHurupay FDV above $30M one day after launch?$1.9K93d ago
- TRADEBUYHurupay FDV above $30M one day after launch?$1.8K93d ago
- TRADESELLHurupay FDV above $30M one day after launch?$1.8K93d ago
- SPLITHurupay FDV above $30M one day after launch?$1.9K93d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 12
- Avg trade size
- $825.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 93d ago
- Last active
- 5h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
