Impish-Velocity
0x64857255c68cd7eaa4e8a7332bfa28ce2700dab1
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$29.72
Total PnL
$-86.28
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- DJOKOVIC
Set 1 Winner: Fonseca vs Djokovic
16 shares @ 61.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 5, 2026$16.39
$6.39
- YES
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score
19 shares @ 54.0¢·now 51.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$9.54
$-0.46
- OVER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5
9 shares @ 47.0¢·now 44.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$3.79
$-0.21
- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-01-31?
39 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-21?
34 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Newcastle United FC win on 2026-03-18?
26 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2026-03-17?
23 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 17, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Arsenal FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
FC Bayern München vs. RU Saint-Gilloise: O/U 3.5
19 shares @ 52.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-01-20?
16 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$4.06May 29, 06:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$10.14May 29, 06:49 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 29, 2:40AM-2:45AM ET$13.04May 29, 06:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 29, 2:40AM-2:45AM ET$5.01May 29, 06:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 29, 2:40AM-2:45AM ET$5.13May 29, 06:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSet 1 Winner: Fonseca vs Djokovic$10.12May 29, 06:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: Both Teams to Score$10.15May 5, 17:57 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-17?$26.32Mar 21, 03:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2026-03-17?$5.00Mar 15, 19:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-17?$5.00Mar 15, 19:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-03-18?$5.00Mar 15, 19:28 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-14?$19.74Mar 15, 19:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-14?$15.00Mar 14, 20:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-25?$15.52Feb 27, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-25?$9.00Feb 25, 18:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-02-21?$9.30Feb 25, 18:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-02-21?$8.00Feb 21, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-21?$20.00Feb 21, 01:43 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-08?$28.00Feb 9, 02:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-02-08?$14.00Feb 8, 21:11 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 28
- Avg trade size
- $10.53
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 11, 20:17 UTC
- Last active
- May 29, 06:50 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".