Apt-Octopus
0x6771fd6f781f049218834ac600292044cb77022a
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$29.73
Total PnL
$-636.78
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $100,000 by December 31, 2026?
14 shares @ 50.7¢·now 80.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$11.20
$4.10
- NO
Will Bitcoin dip to $50,000 by December 31, 2026?
21 shares @ 39.0¢·now 45.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$9.55
$1.36
- NO
Will Bitcoin dip to $55,000 by December 31, 2026?
20 shares @ 25.7¢·now 29.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$5.86
$0.76
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $45,000 by December 31, 2026?
7 shares @ 42.0¢·now 44.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$3.12
$0.17
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $66,000 and $68,000 on February 12?
5023 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-13.57
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $64,000 and $66,000 on February 12?
5000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Seoul be 9°C or higher on February 15?
900 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 15, 2026$0.00
$-4.24
- NO
Will the highest temperature in Seoul be 8°C on February 15?
900 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 15, 2026$0.00
$-5.40
- YES
Will the highest temperature in New York City be 50°F or higher on February 14?
900 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-5.99
- NO
Will the highest temperature in Seoul be 11°C or higher on February 14?
600 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-0.60
Recent activity
- YIELD$0.00Jun 4, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.00Jun 3, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.00Jun 2, 00:13 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - March 1, 4:50PM-4:55PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - March 1, 4:30PM-4:45PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - March 1, 4:40PM-4:45PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - March 1, 4:50PM-4:55PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - March 1, 4:45PM-5:00PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - March 1, 4:40PM-4:45PM ET$1.93Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 1, 5:05PM-5:10PM ET$2.26Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 1, 4:50PM-4:55PM ET$3.03Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 1, 4:30PM-4:35PM ET$4.06Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $62,000 February 23-March 1?$4.28Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMBlues vs. Wild: O/U 5.5$4.90Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - March 1, 4:25PM-4:30PM ET$5.29Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMPhiladelphia Union vs. New York City FC: O/U 2.5$5.65Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 1, 4:25PM-4:30PM ET$7.21Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill New York City FC win on 2026-03-01?$13.07Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- REDEEMKhamenei out as Supreme Leader of Iran by February 28?$37.50Mar 5, 15:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - March 1, 4:45PM-5:00PM ET$1.00Mar 1, 20:46 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 31
- Avg trade size
- $1.25
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 1, 20:31 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 00:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".