Cumbersome-Violet
0x71e13449a93c404322057a37da08cc79b8e888dd
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- UP
Meta (META) Up or Down on February 12?
5453 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-2.5K
- DOWN
Microsoft (MSFT) Up or Down on December 18?
1900 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 18, 2025$0.00
$-950.00
- UP
Russell 2000 (RUT) Up or Down on December 8?
1025 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 8, 2025$0.00
$-471.50
- UP
Tesla (TSLA) Up or Down on November 11?
90 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 11, 2025$0.00
$-35.10
- UP
Amazon (AMZN) Up or Down on November 6?
61 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 6, 2025$0.00
$-27.45
- UP
BNB Up or Down - April 4, 6PM ET
14 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-7.17
- COLOSSAL GAMING
LoL: Colossal Gaming vs GMBLERS ESPORTS (BO5) - LIT Playoffs
12 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-8.76
- UP
Dogecoin Up or Down - April 11, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET
11 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-6.60
Recent activity
- REDEEMLoL: Ground Zero Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - Esports World Cup Asia-Pacific Qualifier Playoffs$12.00May 22, 12:58 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MARKandLARRY vs Ground Zero (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Oceania Cup #4 Playoffs$13.00May 22, 12:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Colossal Gaming vs GMBLERS ESPORTS (BO5) - LIT Playoffs$8.76May 15, 14:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Ground Zero Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - Esports World Cup Asia-Pacific Qualifier Playoffs$6.84May 6, 00:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MARKandLARRY vs Ground Zero (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Oceania Cup #4 Playoffs$8.45Apr 29, 01:10 UTC
- REDEEMDogecoin Up or Down - April 22, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$10.60Apr 29, 01:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYDogecoin Up or Down - April 22, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$5.50Apr 22, 04:08 UTC
- REDEEMDogecoin Up or Down on April 14?$13.00Apr 15, 00:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYDogecoin Up or Down on April 14?$7.15Apr 14, 01:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYDogecoin Up or Down - April 11, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$6.60Apr 11, 04:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down - April 4, 6PM ET$7.42Apr 4, 22:22 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - March 24, 7:45AM-8:00AM ET$15.86Mar 24, 12:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - March 24, 7:45AM-8:00AM ET$7.00Mar 24, 11:47 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - March 16, 2:30AM-2:35AM ET$3.16Mar 16, 06:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - March 16, 2:30AM-2:35AM ET$3.00Mar 16, 06:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYMeta (META) Up or Down on February 12?$2.5KFeb 12, 01:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYMicrosoft (MSFT) Up or Down on December 18?$950.00Dec 17, 14:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYRussell 2000 (RUT) Up or Down on December 8?$471.50Dec 8, 08:05 UTC
- TRADESELLMeta (META) Up or Down on November 28?$904.10Nov 29, 01:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYMeta (META) Up or Down on November 28?$452.50Nov 27, 08:26 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $304.19
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 1, 17:48 UTC
- Last active
- May 22, 12:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".