Unlawful-Drawbridge
0x7d4f6cc806ae8b6fd58e5a4b7d33bc3cb75da33d
Activity score
76/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$16.43
Total PnL
$-0.28
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill D.C. United SC win on 2026-05-09?$19.6512h ago
- TRADEBUYWill D.C. United SC win on 2026-05-09?$16.591d ago
- TRADEBUYWill SC Braga win on 2026-05-11?$16.773d ago
- REDEEMWill Club Libertad win on 2026-05-05?$17.804d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Club Libertad win on 2026-05-05?$16.586d ago
- REDEEMWill Parma Calcio 1913 win on 2026-05-03?$17.136d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Parma Calcio 1913 win on 2026-05-03?$16.1310d ago
- REDEEMWill SC Freiburg win on 2026-04-26?$18.6514d ago
- TRADEBUYWill SC Freiburg win on 2026-04-26?$16.8415d ago
- REDEEMWill FC Arouca win on 2026-04-12?$24.8227d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FC Arouca win on 2026-04-12?$22.1629d ago
- REDEEMWill Portland Timbers win on 2026-04-04?$19.2335d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Portland Timbers win on 2026-04-04?$17.3136d ago
- REDEEMWill Ethena reach $0.24 in March?$17.3339d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethena reach $0.24 in March?$17.3141d ago
- REDEEMGrizzlies vs. Hawks$9.1442d ago
- REDEEMMiami Open: Martin Damm vs Alexander Zverev$10.2048d ago
- REDEEMWill Orlando City SC win on 2026-03-21?$11.3650d ago
- REDEEMCeltics vs. Grizzlies$17.4650d ago
- TRADEBUYGrizzlies vs. Hawks$8.0450d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 25
- Avg trade size
- $13.49
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 71d ago
- Last active
- 12h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
