Squeaky-Polyp
0x7e1d3cb44c3f2a6ec9abc667820ee2645bd44d41
Wallet digest
Activity score
76/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
73
Open notional
$1.9K
Total PnL
$-3.0K
Realised
$-205.84
Win rate
53%
15 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 73- YES
Will Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?
1060 shares @ 88.4¢·now 99.8¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$1.1K
$119.74
- YES
Will Anthropic have the best Code Arena | WebDev AI at the end of July 2026?
420 shares @ 93.5¢·now 98.5¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$413.70
$21.00
- YES
Will GPT-6 be released by September 30, 2026?
200 shares @ 75.0¢·now 64.5¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$129.00
$-21.00
- NO
Will Moonshot be the second-best Code Arena | WebDev AI lab at the end of August 2026?
270 shares @ 48.7¢·now 39.5¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$106.52
$-24.98
- NO
Will Google have the best Math AI model at the end of July 2026?
50 shares @ 83.8¢·now 99.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$49.48
$7.58
- YES
Will Google have the best AI model at the end of August 2026?
1330 shares @ 2.6¢·now 2.6¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$34.58
$-0.79
- NO
Will the next Claude Haiku model be released by August 31, 2026?
55 shares @ 68.0¢·now 55.0¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$30.25
$-7.15
- YES
Will GPT-6 be released by August 31, 2026?
100 shares @ 38.0¢·now 20.5¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$20.50
$-17.50
- NO
Will any AI model reach 1540 Overall Arena Score by September 30, 2026?
15 shares @ 80.0¢·now 82.5¢·exp Sep 30, 2026$12.67
$0.38
- NO
Will the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?
100 shares @ 13.5¢·now 8.0¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$8.00
$-5.50
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$72.96Jul 31, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$9.15Jul 31, 12:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$45.75Jul 31, 12:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$45.80Jul 31, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$3.67Jul 31, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$44.73Jul 31, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$36.80Jul 31, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$25.18Jul 31, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?$1.77Jul 31, 11:26 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Anthropic be the second-best Code Arena | WebDev AI lab at the end of August 2026?$10.00Jul 31, 10:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?$2.13Jul 31, 07:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?$0.37Jul 31, 06:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?$0.00Jul 31, 06:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the next Google Gemini Pro model be released by August 31, 2026?$1.24Jul 31, 06:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill Donald Trump publicly insult Benjamin Netanyahu by June 30, 2026?$0.00Jul 31, 00:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill any AI model reach 1540 Overall Arena Score by September 30, 2026?$12.29Jul 30, 16:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$45.10Jul 30, 15:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$27.76Jul 30, 15:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$8.31Jul 30, 15:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba have the best Chinese AI model at the end of July 2026?$9.02Jul 30, 15:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
31/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Open-position PnL can disappear if liquidity, exit price, or final resolution changes.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
53% win rate over 15 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
45 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 58/100.
15 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $55.89
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 27, 18:05 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 31, 13:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 15 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.