Assured-Caption
0x81ca49ad9806de2d92782b873bfa7fe051943b87
Wallet digest
Activity score
58/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
6
Open notional
$727.59
Total PnL
$-141.25
Realised
$-35.74
Win rate
0%
3 closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Meta be the #2 AI lab at the end of August 2026?
542 shares @ 24.3¢·now 91.0¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$493.23
$361.73
- YES
Will Alibaba be the #3 AI Lab at the end of August 2026 (Style Control On)?
556 shares @ 26.3¢·now 42.0¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$233.36
$87.45
- NO
Will China invade Taiwan by end of 2026?
1 shares @ 96.0¢·now 96.2¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$1.00
$0.00
- NO
Will the next Claude Mythos model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1520?
3636 shares @ 7.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$0.00
$-283.06
- YES
Will Z.ai have the second best Coding AI model at the end of June 2026?
2834 shares @ 9.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-269.46
- YES
Will Anthropic have the third best AI model at the end of April 2026?
36 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-2.17
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Meta be the #2 AI lab at the end of August 2026?$135.49Aug 7, 03:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba be the #3 AI Lab at the end of August 2026 (Style Control On)?$150.21Aug 7, 03:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill China invade Taiwan by end of 2026?$1.00Aug 2, 21:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the US confirm that aliens exist before 2027?$1.12Aug 2, 21:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill any other model be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$9.6KAug 1, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$1.7KAug 1, 18:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Anthropic have the best Code Arena | WebDev AI at the end of July 2026?$493.27Jul 31, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMWill Moonshot have the best Code Arena | WebDev AI at the end of July 2026?$949.40Jul 31, 18:06 UTC
- TAKER_REBATE$10.00Jul 29, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Anthropic have the best Code Arena | WebDev AI at the end of July 2026?$369.39Jul 27, 17:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Moonshot have the best Code Arena | WebDev AI at the end of July 2026?$711.60Jul 27, 17:57 UTC
- TRADESELLWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$1.5KJul 27, 06:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$337.51Jul 27, 06:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$101.25Jul 27, 06:43 UTC
- TRADESELLWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$774.82Jul 27, 06:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill any other model be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$2.0KJul 27, 04:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill claude-opus-4-6-thinking be the best AI model on August 1, 2026?$1.1KJul 27, 04:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Z.ai have the second best Coding AI model at the end of June 2026?$17.39Jun 22, 07:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Anthropic have the second best Coding AI model at the end of June 2026?$92.83Jun 21, 22:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Z.ai have the second best Coding AI model at the end of June 2026?$84.32Jun 20, 16:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
10/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
0% win rate over 3 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
3 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $201.63
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 20, 09:20 UTC
- Last active
- Aug 7, 03:23 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.