Passionate-Tinderbox
0x827c24d5a9419bd2b70f9b3e6ed67203e5ea096e
Wallet digest
Activity score
35/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-115.09
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWho will win the 2022 NFL Pro Bowl?$0.00Feb 20, 14:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill 'Jackass Forever' get 80% or higher Tomatometer Score?$0.00Feb 20, 14:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill 'Jackass Forever' get 80% or higher Tomatometer Score?$60.14Feb 20, 14:40 UTC
- MERGEWho will win the 2022 NFL Pro Bowl?$14.89Feb 6, 23:09 UTC
- REDEEMWill @Whale_Alert tweet count be over 61,300 on January 31 (10 AM ET)?$55.41Feb 1, 21:55 UTC
- REDEEMWill Joe Biden's FiveThirtyEight approval rating be 42.3% or less on January 26?$360.78Jan 28, 23:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Joe Biden's RCP job approval rating on January 21 be between 41.9% and 42.1%?$337.71Jan 25, 09:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 25, 09:13 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 20, 14:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".