Experienced-Limit
0x8d6d80da0dbfdff30fc764ca31878cb620aba150
Wallet digest
Activity score
63/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
5
Open notional
$62.08
Total PnL
$-72.78
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- EVERTON FC
Spread: Everton FC (-1.5)
92 shares @ 30.3¢·now 27.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$25.42
$-2.58
- YES
Will Aston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC end in a draw?
87 shares @ 26.0¢·now 25.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$22.18
$-0.43
- YES
Will Getafe CF vs. RCD Mallorca end in a draw?
46 shares @ 31.0¢·now 31.5¢·exp May 13, 2026$14.48
$0.23
- LIVERPOOL FC
Spread: Liverpool FC (-1.5)
129 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- 1. FSV MAINZ 05
Spread: 1. FSV Mainz 05 (-1.5)
91 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Getafe CF vs. RCD Mallorca end in a draw?$14.541d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC end in a draw?$23.111d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Everton FC (-1.5)$28.591d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)$94.323d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: 1. FSV Mainz 05 (-1.5)$30.605d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)$50.905d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Liverpool FC (-1.5)$40.835d ago
- REDEEMSC Freiburg vs. SC Braga: O/U 3.5$61.485d ago
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. SC Braga: O/U 3.5$8.486d ago
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. SC Braga: O/U 3.5$8.486d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $33.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 6d ago
- Last active
- 1d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
