Wallet profile

Inferior-Fry

0x91aab8d0ae5c7dde7d9ea7ca49aeb985e09819b8

activity 76/100

Wallet digest

active

Activity score

76/100

Performance measurable

Open positions

200

Open notional

$45.0K

Total PnL

$-16.2K

Realised

$2.5K

Win rate

52%

21 closed

Guardrail: wallet activity is not profitability, and large trades are not smart money. Use the sample, concentration, and copy-risk dimensions before reading this profile as meaningful.

Largest open positions

showing 10 of 200

Recent activity

Persistent ledger timeline

persistent

Ledger volume

$22.6K

Trades

1

Buy share

100%

Window

May 29, 07:10 UTC → Jun 30, 14:57 UTC

Last 30 days · daily volumemax $0.00

Wallet edge sanity

Needs review

38/100
read-only

Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.

PnL is mostly mark-to-market

Open-position PnL can disappear if liquidity, exit price, or final resolution changes.

Elevated mirror risk

Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.

Late-entry profile

Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.

Required before treating wallet flow as useful

Resolved-only performance

52% win rate over 21 closed markets.

Copy-lag simulation

A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.

Liquidity and exit

Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.

Resolution-source risk

The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.

Survivorship bias

Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.

Wallet intelligence filter

Watch only

0/100
no PredictFoliopaper-only

Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.

Wallet signal
review

45 live trades, 3 ledger trades, copy-risk 62/100.

Resolved-only track record
review

21 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.

Cost / slippage
missing

No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.

Resolution risk
missing

No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.

Market liquidity
missing

No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.

Copy-lag simulation
missing

No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.

Paper-only attribution
missing

No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.

Ledger intelligence

persistent

7d volume

$0.00

0 trades

30d volume

$0.00

0 trades

Buy share

100%

Sample

limited

3 ledger trades

Top market concentration

Will Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in May?

$10.0K · 44% of recorded whale volume

Recorded market concentration

Will Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in May?44% of recorded volume$10.0KWill Bitcoin reach $90,000 in May?31% of recorded volume$7.0KBitcoin Up or Down - June 30, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET25% of recorded volume$5.6K

Profile dimensions

Activity72 / 100

Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.

Performance confidence70 / 100

How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.

Specialization0 / 100

Share of trades concentrated in their top category.

Early-entry24 / 100

Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.

Copy-risk62 / 100

How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.

Trades (all time)
45
Avg trade size
$18.41
Top category
—
Category concentration
0%
First seen
Jul 5, 06:39 UTC
Last active
Jul 5, 07:06 UTC
Win rate sample
21 closed

The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.

View on PolymarketView on Polygonscan
updated 07:13:53 UTC·src:Polymarket Data