Generous-Tentacle
0xa3ba2642b4dc4cdc31d4a55644ccc1c7cd486dc6
Activity score
72/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$20.13
Total PnL
$-0.69
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Avalanche: O/U 4.5$20.8722h ago
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Wellington be 21°C or higher on April 26?$7.5016d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Wellington be 21°C or higher on April 26?$7.4817d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Hurricanes (-1.5)$17.8417d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Hurricanes (-1.5)$12.7829d ago
- TRADESELLOdds of Khamenei out by February over 30% in January?$1.3K103d ago
- TRADESELLOdds of Khamenei out by February over 30% in January?$23.62103d ago
- TRADEBUYOdds of Khamenei out by February over 30% in January?$1.4K103d ago
- MERGEWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$1.5K103d ago
- TRADEBUYWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$871.20103d ago
- TRADEBUYWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$580.20103d ago
- TRADESELLWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$698.41103d ago
- TRADESELLWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$744.59103d ago
- SPLITWill EA say "Jared" or "Kushner" during earnings call?$1.5K103d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $566.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 103d ago
- Last active
- 22h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
