0xb64dc93ff775f450535881982ced751402f2fdb4
0xb64dc93ff775f450535881982ced751402f2fdb4
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$851.41
Total PnL
$-828.98
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Xi meet with Takaichi by December 31, 2026?
1194 shares @ 57.0¢·now 64.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$763.91
$83.52
- YES
Zhang Youxia sentenced to prison before 2027?
833 shares @ 12.0¢·now 10.5¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$87.50
$-12.50
- NO
Will Ethereum dip to $2,200 in May?
2574 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$0.00
$-900.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Xi meet with Takaichi by December 31, 2026?$488.49May 8, 07:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Xi meet with Takaichi by December 31, 2026?$203.60May 8, 07:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhang Youxia sentenced to prison before 2027?$100.00May 8, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,200 in May?$942.14May 3, 17:27 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $433.56
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 3, 17:27 UTC
- Last active
- May 8, 07:42 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".