Possible-Alphabet
0xb839e63b6d01116a0f8830005fdf545420955f5b
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-6.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - April 3, 1:15PM-1:20PM ET
207 shares @ 11.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-24.60
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 7:45PM-7:50PM ET
111 shares @ 69.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-76.97
- UP
XRP Up or Down - April 5, 11:50AM-11:55AM ET
103 shares @ 58.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-60.50
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 7:40PM-7:45PM ET
100 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-57.71
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 4:25PM-4:30PM ET
98 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-71.48
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 6, 11:20AM-11:25AM ET
93 shares @ 40.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 6, 2026$0.00
$-37.55
- DOWN
XRP Up or Down - April 5, 6:00PM-6:05PM ET
93 shares @ 77.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-71.71
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 4:35PM-4:40PM ET
92 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-64.28
- DOWN
XRP Up or Down - April 5, 6:25PM-6:30PM ET
90 shares @ 73.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-66.22
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 6:30AM-6:35AM ET
90 shares @ 74.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-67.17
Recent activity
- REDEEMKnicks vs. Spurs$0.46Jun 4, 03:36 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros ATP: Matteo Berrettini vs Matteo Arnaldi$0.00Jun 3, 22:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Matteo Berrettini vs Matteo Arnaldi$10.18Jun 3, 19:44 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$0.00Jun 3, 13:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$10.19Jun 3, 10:21 UTC
- TRADESELLRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$9.49Jun 3, 09:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$10.13Jun 3, 09:01 UTC
- REDEEMTexas Rangers vs. St. Louis Cardinals$0.00Jun 3, 04:15 UTC
- REDEEMCleveland Guardians vs. New York Yankees$0.48Jun 3, 03:45 UTC
- REDEEMChicago White Sox vs. Minnesota Twins$0.00Jun 3, 03:41 UTC
- REDEEMSan Francisco Giants vs. Milwaukee Brewers$0.00Jun 3, 03:02 UTC
- REDEEMToronto Blue Jays vs. Atlanta Braves$0.00Jun 3, 02:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. St. Louis Cardinals$10.24Jun 3, 02:30 UTC
- REDEEMBaltimore Orioles vs. Boston Red Sox$0.00Jun 3, 02:25 UTC
- REDEEMDetroit Tigers vs. Tampa Bay Rays$0.00Jun 3, 02:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYChicago White Sox vs. Minnesota Twins$10.24Jun 3, 01:45 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: SaD Esports vs NRG Academy (BO3) - VCL North America: Stage 3 Group Stage$0.00Jun 3, 01:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYSan Francisco Giants vs. Milwaukee Brewers$10.24Jun 2, 23:59 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros ATP: Jakub Mensik vs Joao Fonseca$0.00Jun 2, 23:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYBaltimore Orioles vs. Boston Red Sox$10.19Jun 2, 23:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $9.37
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 2, 14:00 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 03:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".