Kindly-Beef
0xc16a303a05c6089e64c1ee21f3a4e8567187d1e4
Wallet digest
Activity score
54/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
64
Open notional
$247.80
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$-267.70
Win rate
0%
5 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 64- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?
146 shares @ 64.0¢·now 57.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$84.20
$-9.57
- NO
Will AFC Bournemouth win on 2026-05-19?
69 shares @ 84.4¢·now 78.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$54.10
$-4.08
- NO
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-24?
50 shares @ 69.2¢·now 70.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$35.13
$0.63
- NO
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?
69 shares @ 43.6¢·now 42.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$29.30
$-0.78
- NO
Will AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC end in a draw?
13 shares @ 78.0¢·now 78.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$10.37
$0.07
- YES
Will AFC Bournemouth win on 2026-05-19?
46 shares @ 24.0¢·now 21.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$9.88
$-1.15
- YES
Will Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-24?
11 shares @ 51.1¢·now 49.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$5.55
$-0.19
- YES
Will AFC Bournemouth win on 2026-05-24?
11 shares @ 51.0¢·now 40.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$4.56
$-1.26
- YES
Will Fulham FC win on 2026-05-24?
12 shares @ 50.0¢·now 35.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$4.10
$-1.68
- YES
Will Sunderland AFC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?
9 shares @ 31.0¢·now 25.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$2.35
$-0.51
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$195.33May 18, 00:32 UTC
- REDEEMWill RCD Mallorca win on 2026-05-17?$631.68May 17, 23:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill Atalanta BC win on 2026-05-17?$487.62May 17, 22:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce end in a draw?$1.28May 17, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce end in a draw?$17.47May 17, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce end in a draw?$13.93May 17, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce end in a draw?$6.49May 17, 20:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-17?$129.60May 17, 20:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brentford FC vs. Crystal Palace FC end in a draw?$1.1KMay 17, 20:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brentford FC win on 2026-05-17?$46.45May 17, 20:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-24?$34.82May 17, 20:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$42.81May 17, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill Leeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC end in a draw?$18.48May 17, 19:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill Everton FC win on 2026-05-17?$284.62May 17, 19:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill Sunderland AFC win on 2026-05-17?$26.04May 17, 19:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill Everton FC vs. Sunderland AFC end in a draw?$34.95May 17, 19:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tottenham Hotspur FC win on 2026-05-24?$1.03May 17, 19:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Mallorca win on 2026-05-17?$98.19May 17, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Mallorca win on 2026-05-17?$20.35May 17, 17:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Mallorca win on 2026-05-17?$467.55May 17, 17:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 29
- Avg trade size
- $77.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 14:54 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 00:32 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 5 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".