Narrow-Month
0xcdb44265496d400dab5beb54a7ff0ffbe8aa5548
Wallet digest
Activity score
90/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$2.1K
Total PnL
$-5.13
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Invictus Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?
460 shares @ 99.7¢·now 99.6¢·exp May 22, 2026$458.12
$-0.88
- NO
Will Team WE qualify for EWC 2026?
279 shares @ 99.7¢·now 99.6¢·exp May 22, 2026$277.47
$-0.53
- NO
Will Oh My God qualify for EWC 2026?
260 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.7¢·exp May 22, 2026$259.58
$-0.42
- NO
Will ThunderTalk Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?
260 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 22, 2026$259.06
$-0.94
- NO
Will LGD Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?
190 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.7¢·exp May 22, 2026$189.55
$-0.45
- NO
Will Ultra Prime qualify for EWC 2026?
160 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.7¢·exp May 22, 2026$159.68
$-0.32
- NO
Will LNG Esports qualify for EWC 2026?
160 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.6¢·exp May 22, 2026$159.52
$-0.48
- NO
Will EDward Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?
160 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.6¢·exp May 22, 2026$159.44
$-0.56
- NO
Will Ninjas in Pyjamas qualify for EWC 2026?
160 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.6¢·exp May 22, 2026$159.44
$-0.56
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Team WE qualify for EWC 2026?$278.02May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Invictus Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?$459.04May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill ThunderTalk Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?$260.01May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ninjas in Pyjamas qualify for EWC 2026?$160.00May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill LGD Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?$190.01May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill LNG Esports qualify for EWC 2026?$160.00May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill EDward Gaming qualify for EWC 2026?$160.00May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ultra Prime qualify for EWC 2026?$160.00May 14, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Oh My God qualify for EWC 2026?$260.01May 14, 03:20 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Team WE vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$600.90May 3, 06:04 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$4.0KMay 3, 06:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$903.84May 2, 13:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$99.90May 2, 13:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$310.21May 2, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$4.74May 2, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$519.48May 2, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$159.84May 2, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$2.0KMay 2, 13:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$300.01May 2, 08:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$300.02May 2, 08:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $477.05
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 19, 12:42 UTC
- Last active
- May 14, 03:21 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".