Haunting-Sinuosity
0xde45d1bd31966fb93571c7de1a67c7a7d1ff1a8d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
51
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.5K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 51- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-05-30?
672 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$0.00
$-255.43
- SPURS
Thunder vs. Spurs
545 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-04-24?
528 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-285.17
- YES
Will Slovakia win on 2026-03-26?
476 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 26, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- FELIX AUGER-ALIASSIME
Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Flavio Cobolli
417 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 10, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- SPURS
Spread: Spurs (-1.5)
385 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- DANIEL ALTMAIER
Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Daniel Altmaier
370 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- THUNDER
Thunder vs. Spurs
366 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- PISTONS
Pistons vs. Magic
306 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 6, 2026$0.00
$-164.97
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 30, 4:00AM-4:05AM ET
279 shares @ 7.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Diana Shnaider vs Maja Chwalinska$160.10Jun 4, 14:51 UTC
- TRADESELLRoland Garros WTA: Marta Kostyuk vs Mirra Andreeva$160.19Jun 4, 14:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Marta Kostyuk vs Mirra Andreeva$74.97Jun 4, 12:10 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Spurs (-4.5)$74.28Jun 4, 02:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Spurs (-4.5)$332.40Jun 3, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Flavio Cobolli$203.12Jun 3, 14:39 UTC
- TRADESELLRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$73.05Jun 3, 10:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$54.75Jun 3, 09:01 UTC
- REDEEMAthletics vs. Chicago Cubs$138.30Jun 3, 08:59 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros ATP: Jakub Mensik vs Joao Fonseca$154.00Jun 3, 08:59 UTC
- REDEEMToronto Blue Jays vs. Atlanta Braves$113.21Jun 3, 08:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska$101.20Jun 3, 06:20 UTC
- TRADESELLLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$161.57Jun 3, 04:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYToronto Blue Jays vs. Atlanta Braves$60.85Jun 2, 21:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletics vs. Chicago Cubs$66.03Jun 2, 21:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$101.41Jun 2, 21:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Jakub Mensik vs Joao Fonseca$101.05Jun 2, 20:18 UTC
- REDEEMRoland Garros WTA: Mirra Andreeva vs Sorana Cirstea$375.00Jun 2, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Mirra Andreeva vs Sorana Cirstea$250.02Jun 2, 09:02 UTC
- TRADESELLRoland Garros ATP: Frances Tiafoe vs Matteo Arnaldi$45.70Jun 1, 20:35 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $123.27
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 25, 19:44 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 14:51 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".